The ported vacuum is clever.
I wonder if a slightly lighter damper oil (less viscous, easier to move with that little bit of extra force) would do the trick?
Damper oil viscosity is often viewed as a dark art though
Cheers,
Harv
Hi Craig,Craig Allardyce wrote: Sat Jan 31, 2026 7:43 am The ported vacuum trial didn't work that well. On deceleration it sucked the piston to the top of its travel lol. I should have thought of that happening.
Anyway, one thing got the better of me. It stuck in my mind that it always takes more force to initially move something than to keep it moving. These carbs (HIF type SU) were always spec'd with ball bearing suction chambers. I never fitted them, and stayed with the old style. They looked better, and you could run large or small diameter piston springs, which gives you more options with combinations of the two types. These older ones always had a slight drag due to oil/fuel film on the piston tube and the suction chamber (very close tolerance).
As my initial problem was going rich during the first part of the piston lifting, I decided to try the ball bearing chambers. Low and behold, it has dramatically improved. I'm now going to go with running the low pressure suction restrictor on the float bowl vent line. Using the manometer tubes, and with the vacuum line fitted to the float bowl vent tube, I can see and control the amount of fuel drop in the main jet. I just have to get the restrictor the right size so excessive fuel isn't leaned out at higher airflow through the carby. Good thing I have one to measure with some jet drills.
Point to note, the fuel bowls are still vented normally to atmosphere. The vacuum via the restrictor is teed into this line. I was quite suprised how little negative pressure you need to alter the fuel level in the jet. It's not even readable on analogue vacuum gauge at idle, but drops the fuel level an inch or so.
It also look like I have to polish up another set of vacuum chambers now!
e6b5e690-ece7-4642-8f3f-da7871df7aa3.jpg
67a0aa65-8b77-4f39-a013-3a4a70f83e47.jpg2add9bae-5ba4-4695-9818-0a5c3f268157.jpg
Yes mate. 1/8npt. No drilling required.Harv wrote: Mon Apr 13, 2026 12:19 am Did you tap the dipstick port to 1/8 NPT? Curious, as the factory port size is near perfect for tapping that thread.
Cheers,
Harv
You need to make a jig that supports the drill bit in the lifter bore due to the angle. You also have to calculate the angle required vs the hole position in the lifter bore. This will also depend on what your cam lift is. This is to ensure the hole is within the oil groove of the lifter proximity. You will also need different pushrods as the cup type and size in the lifter is different, as well as the tappet adjusters. I needed to run oil up the pushrods as I could not source the same pushrod and adjuster set up. My adjusters are cupped downwards. Camshaft closing rates are important if you want to run hydraulics with out them pumping up. I had to run heavier springs due to my high lift and low duration cam. So no, not much dicking aroundBlacky wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 10:29 pm Thats purty![]()
![]()
![]()
How much rooting around is the hydraulic lifter conversion mate ??? I would be real interested in doing that