ratbox wrote:why not windows in the side
x2, give it more of a factory extended cab look.
ratbox wrote:why not windows in the side
i can sortof picture what yor saying, and the last bit you said is all that really mattersRusty EK wrote: Ratbox , looked for windows for ages that would go ,but they all just didnt look right , I know there will be people that dont think this looks right either , but was going for a sort of panel van look side on ,if that makes sense, iam happy with it so far .
Is that an echo...................Smooth customs wrote: is going to be an ICV?
V8EK4us wrote:Is that an echo...................Smooth customs wrote: is going to be an ICV?
My bet is definately ICV and I think you would be the same SC.Smooth customs wrote:V8EK4us wrote:Is that an echo...................Smooth customs wrote: is going to be an ICV?
sounds like it
Looks like we both are interested in what it will be viewed as at rego time.
Smooth customs wrote:sounds like it
Looks like we both are interested in what it will be viewed as at rego time.
v8ek4us wrote:My bet is definately ICV and I think you would be the same SC.
If it's not I want the number of his EngineerSmooth customs wrote:it has to be with that extent of fabrication, and modification to the base body.
THAT'S where I saw something similar...from memory & I might be wrong here but was'nt it a Blue HT panel van/ute?? OK who has old 'shaggin' wagon' magazines???Smooth customs wrote: This is wild
After reading the comparison to a panel van, this build reminded me of something that you would have seen in a 70's Custom Panel Van magazine.
Has your engineer outlined everything required and inspected progress on the build, and it is going to be an ICV?